revolutionary motherhood exclamation points

June 25, 2008 at 8:59 pm (Uncategorized)

so the REVOLUTIONARY MOTHERHOOD publication is available!  yay!

get your copy today!

suggested 7 dollar donation!

exclamation points!

contact maia!

loving y’all

Permalink Leave a Comment

why we must support cynthia mc kinney

June 25, 2008 at 6:37 pm (anti-oppression, anti-racism, middle east, women of color)

The Organizer Newspaper
P.O. Box 40009, San Francisco, CA 94140.
Tel. (415) 626-1175; fax: (415) 626-1217.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, contact <>
email: The Organizer <>
New web site:

The Obama Nomination and Why We Must Support
Cynthia McKinney’s Power to the People Campaign
Ten days ago, Sister Cynthia McKinney, presidential candidate of the Power to the People campaign, issued a statement on the imminent nomination of Barack Obama as the presidential candidate of the Democratic Party.
In this statement, Sister McKinney noted that the Obama nomination was not business-as-usual in the United States, nor was it the result expected by the ruling class and its pundits. Hillary Clinton believed that she was the anointed candidate, and everything indicated she would be the party’s standard-bearer in November 2008. She had the corporate funding, the “leadership experience,” and the full backing of the central leaders of the Democratic Party.
Obama was being groomed by the Democratic Party elders for the future, perhaps for a 2012 or 2016 presidential nomination. For now, the best he could hope for would be a prominent spot in a Clinton cabinet — to help put out some of the political fires at home and abroad resulting from the rapacious policies of U.S. imperialism.
But Clinton’s “leadership” message faltered, and Obama’s message of “change” caught on like wildfire, especially among young voters and African Americans of all ages. After Super Tuesday, when Clinton expected that the nomination would be pretty much in the bag, her campaign was in shock. They did not anticipate the Obama-mania that was sweeping parts of the country.
The Obama phenomenon, of course, was not a mass movement with a conscious understanding of its aims; rather it was (and remains) a strictly electoral phenomenon with an amorphous concept that things cannot remain as they are. Obama was viewed as the best possible champion of “change” among the bunch of candidates put forward by the twin parties of the bosses. But the Obama phenomenon shook the Democratic Party and forced the commanding heights of that party to adjust their strategy.
Provocation and Containment
The first reaction by the central party leaders, with the help of a compliant media, was a staged provocation aimed at putting Clinton back in the saddle. (The biggest staging, of course, was the ABC TV candidates’ “debate,” where both TV anchors did their absolute best to “nail” Obama.) This involved featuring — and distorting — the declarations of the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, and forcing Obama either to back his pastor or reject him, with the hope that in either case there would be a “white backlash” against Obama.
This provocation did not produce the desired results, however. Clinton was not able to get enough of the backlash to give her a resounding lead in Indiana, or a draw in South Carolina. Her campaign had one bite at that apple and failed. The momentum for Obama — reflecting the deep aspiration for change in this country — was too great to stop.
The next reaction by the party hierarchy (and by the summits of the white ruling class in this country) was to accept Obama while ensuring that he would be totally pliable — that is, totally willing and able to carry out, unencumbered, the policy imperatives of U.S. imperialism in the aftermath of the reckless, cowboy politics of the Bush-Cheney cabal, politics that have undermined the image of U.S. imperialism worldwide and shaken the stability of the world capitalist system as a whole.
This tactical shift by the leading circles of U.S. finance capital requires, for example, pressing for a Hamilton-Baker Pan “solution” in the Middle East (diplomatic overtures to share more widely the load of occupation and containment, plus permanent U.S. bases and threats of military attacks, including nuclear attacks) and “neo-corporatist” solutions to co-opt the unions and movements of resistance into accepting the bitter pills of “free trade” and privatization in the name of a “New World Governance.” (A separate article is required to explain this orientation in greater depth.)
This meant pressing Obama to distance himself more and more from his Black base and to repudiate — perhaps not so much in his rhetoric but in the formulation of his concrete policy planks — anything that could lead to real change, anything that could put into question global capital’s quest to resolve its growing economic and financial crisis on the backs of working people and all the oppressed worldwide.
Hence, in the two weeks since Clinton stepped down as a presidential candidate, Obama has willingly and faithfully made a marked shift to the right, to assure the corporate paymasters of the Democratic and Republican parties that he will be a loyal servant of their interests.
The list is getting longer by the day. Here are a few examples:
* Obama “out-Bushed” John McCain in his speech at the national gathering of the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), going so far as to claim that Jerusalem must remain an Israel city. His endorsement of the Israeli state and its Zionist-expansionist policies was unabashed … and unqualified.
* Speaking to right-wing Cuban exiles in Miami, Obama pledged to maintain the criminal embargo against Cuba. He also backed the illegal incursion of Colombian troops into Ecuador (troops sent in at the behest of the Bush administration), in violation of that country’s sovereignty, in the name of the “war on terrorism,” thereby sending a signal throughout the region that U.S. interventionism would remain alive and well under an Obama administration.
* Speaking at a conservative Black church in Chicago (thereby consummating his break with the Rev. Wright and his former church), Obama echoed all the rightwing’s racist attacks against Black men, to the point of referring to them as “boys,” without even bothering to provide any policy alternatives to the growing plight of Black America that has resulted in the increased criminalization/incarceration of Black men.
* Speaking to a panel of economists quoted in the June 17 Wall Street Journal, Obama said that he was “seriously considering backing a reduction in corporate tax rates.” (Obama has called on top pro-corporate advisers, beginning with Robert E. Rubin, to head up his economics team, which alarmed John Sweeney of the AFL-CIO.)
* Speaking to military officials in Washington, Obama did not rule out a military running mate and noted that “perhaps it may not be possible to withdraw U.S. troops from Iraq in the time frame I had initially envisioned.” (Washington Post, June 12)
An Independent Campaign Addressed to the Working Class Majority, to All the Oppressed
In her June 7 statement on the Obama nomination and in subsequent articles, Cynthia McKinney has sought to open a dialogue with the millions of people who still have illusions in Barack Obama and who will likely vote for him.
McKinney noted that the deep aspiration for change among the American people is what accounted for Obama’s surge in the primaries, and she went on to outline the platform planks that need to be implemented by the next president of the United States so that this long-awaited change can become a reality, and not remain an illusion. These are planks culled from the Draft Manifesto of the National Organizing Committee of the Reconstruction Party, a platform to which she contributed significantly. [See the June 7 statement on her website,, for the full list of platform planks highlighted in this dialogue.]
McKinney did not say to the millions of Black people who celebrated Obama’s victory in the primaries as their own victory, despite his rotten political positions: “Take my word for it, Barack Obama is a sell-out and will only betray your interests.” There would be no dialogue possible on this basis, no way to help them shed their illusions in Obama and take steps toward breaking with the Democratic Party to support her Power to the People campaign.
Rather, she enjoined both Obama and his supporters nationwide to embrace the policy initiatives proposed in the Draft Manifesto because this is what millions of Americans expect — and need — from any candidate, especially a Black candidate, who aspires to the presidency and claims to represent “change.” But McKinney also made it clear that she was not forfeiting her own independent campaign in order to become an “advisor” of sorts to Obama. Quite the contrary. “Our platform,” McKinney stated in her latest fund appeal, “is the only one that genuinely addresses the needs and aspirations for real change that have been expressed by voters nationwide.”
Her challenge to Obama was unequivocal: If Obama were to support publicly some of the most important platform planks for change contained in this Draft Manifesto — and if he were to pledge publicly to take steps toward putting these planks into practice once elected — he would obtain, without a doubt, the overwhelming support of the American people.
But if Obama were not to support these specific platform planks, if he were not to pledge to begin implementing them once in office, Sister McKinney could not accept a situation where these vital policy issues were removed from the discussion table in the months leading up to the November 2008 presidential election.

“The message of our campaign is necessary now, more than ever,” McKinney insisted in her fund appeal. “Congress is on the verge of caving in on more funding for the occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan; our country bombs Somalia and Pakistan with impunity and none of the major party contenders mentions it; the American people are losing their homes at a record pace, Congress is yet to offer a solution; and our country is even more mired in debt.”
This is the language of a genuinely independent campaign addressed to the millions of people in this country who are longing for a change and who are hoping against hope that Obama can be the vehicle for that change. It is the language of an independent campaign aimed at winning the working class majority and all the oppressed, beginning with the masses of Black people in this country, away from the Democratic Party to the banner of independent politics and Power to the People — to the banner of the Reconstruction Party.
Help Sister McKinney Qualify for Federal Matching Funds!

As a socialist and advocate of a clean break with the Democratic Party, it is clear to me — just as it is clear to a growing wing of the Black Liberation Movement — that Obama is not about to embrace any of the platform planks contained in the Draft Manifesto for a Reconstruction Party. In fact, Obama is moving at an astounding speed in the opposite direction in his quest to be the best possible representative of U.S. corporate interests. This is the name of the game in the Democratic Party.

This is why the Power of the People presidential campaign of Cynthia McKinney is so crucial today, why it must be supported by all politically conscious activists across the country.

Glen Ford, executive editor of the Black Agenda Report, put it best when he wrote in an article posted earlier today that, “There is a presidential candidate who is Black, a proven progressive, a person of courage and unchallenged integrity. Cynthia McKinney, running on a Power to the People platform for the Green Party nomination, wants to rebuild a real movement. Peace and racial and social justice cannot be achieved absent a popular movement, which in the United States must be led by African Americans.”
But support for Sister McKinney’s Power to the People cannot remain passive. Her campaign needs funds urgently. In her latest fund appeal she wrote:
“My campaign is not funded by the military-industrial-financial-media complex, nor the energy, pharmaceutical or other corporate interests that bankroll the parties of war: the Democrats and Republicans. I can only count on you, the people who produce the wealth in this country, to finance my campaign.
“I need your support to get out the political message of our Power to the People campaign to voters all across the country. …
“With your help, we can achieve our goal of raising the $100,000 in 20 states needed to obtain the federal matching funds. Please go to our website today ( and make as generous a donation as you can. Then send all your friends, coworkers, and neighbors to this site, asking that they match or exceed your donation.  I do believe in the power of the people.
“Please help me put this first campaign milestone behind us, so we can get the Power to the People campaign on every ballot possible nationwide — so that we can provide a genuine alternative to the No Impeachment, War Parties and their candidates. Our communities deserve so much more and the Power to the People campaign is ready to deliver.  Your donation now will help us deliver with an impact.  Thank you in advance for your contribution to this effort.”
Can you make a contribution today to this fund?

— San Francisco, June 18, 2008


Alan Benjamin is the Editor of The Organizer newspaper. To obtain a sample copy of The Organizer, please send a note to the email address listed above.

Permalink Leave a Comment

paying attention

June 24, 2008 at 7:05 pm (anti-racism) ()

so right now we are in chicago after spending a couple of weeks in northern va.  being in chicago is strange after all this time.  so much of it i associate with the fucked up organization: cpt.  i dont write about them much because i dont like to dwell on the past or on fucked up shit, but that org is based in chicago and i spent alot of my time in chicago the past few years dealing with them.

cpt stands for christian peacemaker teams.

yes, i once belonged to an organization with such a dorky name.

so why the hell am i writing about them now?  well, a few months ago they invited me to apply for the ‘antiracism consultant’ position for cpt.  which i foolishly did.  and then they rudely abruptly told me that i was not ‘independent and objective’ enough to be the consultant.  i am posting the rejecting letter here:

From: Sylvia Morrison <>
To: mai’a <>
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 10:02:26 PM
Subject: Re: Undoing Racism Consultant

DIV { MARGIN:0px;}

Maia Williams Carpenter

San Cristóbal de las Casas, Chiapas, MX

February 22, 2008

Dear Ms. Williams Carpenter:

Thank you for your interest in serving Christian Peacemaker Teams, again, this time as an anti-racism consultant. We greatly appreciate your interest and commitment to undoing racism wherever possible.

It is our top priority to select an independent, objective consulting team who best matches the skills and experience required to guide CPT in an extensive audit, strategic planning and practice transformation so that we can be best equipped to undo our organization’s internal racism. While we were impressed with your breadth of experience and unwavering commitment to peacemaking, after careful consideration by our committee we have decided to pursue other options for this contractual position.

We appreciate your interest in seeing CPT better reflect the reign of God, and we pray God’s best for you in your endeavors.


Hiring Committee


frankly, i have no interest in the ‘reign of god’ or whatever other hocus pocus that they conjure.  and they did not hire anyone else.  they have just kept looking.  for 6 months.  ya know how anti-racism takes a long time when you are looking for the easy way out.

a friend asked me if i thought that white orgs can change a few weeks ago as she was trying not to discuss the fact that she belongs to this piece of shite org.

if i had been accepted, this article would have been a great inspiration: raising minority graduation rates

to quote: “If there is a single factor that seems to distinguish colleges and universities that have truly made a difference on behalf of minority students, it is attention,” Carey says. “Successful colleges pay attention to graduation rates. They monitor year-to-year change, study the impact of different interventions on student outcomes, break down the numbers among different student populations, and continuously ask themselves how they could improve. Essentially, they apply the academic values of empiricism and deep inquiry to themselves.”

crazy, huh?

it doesnt require independence or objectivity

it requires attention and deep inquiry

and it is possible.

Permalink Leave a Comment

agent orange victims sue monsanto

June 16, 2008 at 5:10 pm (anti-oppression, Motherhood)

Tran Anh Kiet’s feet, hands and limbs are twisted and deformed. He is 21 years old, but trapped inside a body that appears to belong to a 15 year old with a mental age of around six. He has to be spoon-fed and writhes often in evident frustration. All his attempts at speech are confined to plaintive and pitiful grunts.

In Kiet’s small community in Cu Chi district, about 45 kilometers from Ho Chi Minh city, south Vietnam, his story is all too common – indeed the villagers have a name for young people like him: Agent Orange babies.

Some 79 million liters of Agent Orange herbicides were dropped on the jungles of Vietnam from 1961-1971 in an attempt to defoliate the rainforest and deny any cover for the VietCong guerilla forces resisting the United States occupation of Vietnam.

Today in Vietnam there are 150,000 other children like Kiet, whose parents allege their birth defects are the result of exposure to Agent Orange during the war, or the consumption of dioxin-contaminated food and water since 1975.

Permalink Leave a Comment

Special Weapons’ Have a Fallout on Babies in Fallujah

June 16, 2008 at 5:01 pm (middle east, women of color)

today i feel like anyone who supports this war is heartless.  ii realize this a sweeping statement.

here is the problem: it is not just this generation of children being born (when they survive) with conginental deformities.  but that (i bet) we are going to see generations of children born still suffering.  imagine a woman who has not been born yetgiving birth to a child with illnesses and deformities because we bombed their country 50 years ago.

what are we doing.

there is a place a moment when ignorance is no longer an excuse.

this is our moment.

Babies born in Fallujah are showing illnesses and deformities on a scale never seen before, doctors and residents say.

The new cases, and the number of deaths among children, have risen after “special weaponry” was used in the two massive bombing campaigns in Fallujah in 2004.

After denying it at first, the Pentagon admitted in November 2005 that white phosphorous, a restricted incendiary weapon, was used a year earlier in Fallujah.

In addition, depleted uranium (DU) munitions, which contain low-level radioactive waste, were used heavily in Fallujah. The Pentagon admits to having used 1,200 tons of DU in Iraq thus far.

“Maternal exposure to toxins and radioactive material can lead to miscarriage and frequent abortions, still birth, and congenital malformation,” the doctor told IPS. There have been many such cases, and the government “did not move to contain the damage, or present any assistance to the hospital whatsoever.

A senior Iraqi health ministry official was quoted as saying Feb. 26 that the health sector is under “great pressure”, with scores of doctors killed, an exodus of medical personnel, poor medical infrastructure, and shortage of medicines.

Permalink Leave a Comment

June 16, 2008 at 4:45 pm (anti-racism)

okay check out gwen iffill’s tribute to tim russert.  i know i know.  someome dies and everyone has to pretend he was a saint.  ok obviously he was no saint.  nothing close.

but i  love some of her descriptions of him:

I made my last appearance with him on Meet the Press a few weeks ago. We were talking about race in the context of this year’s presidential contest and another panelist, Jon Meacham of Newsweek, remarked that race was a subject that made white folks queasy. I countered that black folks only get queasy talking about race when they are in conversation with white folks who get queasy talking about it. Tim’s eyes twinkled when he looked at me. He absolutely loved that I was telling him something he had not thought of before.

I never minded talking about race with Tim, because he was never queasy talking about it with me.

and this description of the don imus controversy:

I felt compelled to call Tim and explain. If I come on your show, I told him, I will be forced to criticize the journalists who had enabled Imus over the years, leading up to his stunning insult of the Rutgers basketball team. Tim knew – and I knew – that Imus had insulted me too, years before. When I told Tim I didn’t feel I could come to his house and insult him, he quickly assured me that he wanted me to come and say what I had to say. People needed to hear it, he told me.

So I went, and I told him to his face that I found his defense of Imus disappointing. I got a lot of kudos for speaking truth to power that day, but the real news was that Tim allowed me to say what I had to say, knowing it would not make him look good. That does not happen a lot – in life or politics.

Permalink Leave a Comment

private fantasies

June 13, 2008 at 4:51 am (Uncategorized)

stereotypes cause private fantasies.  the rich think that poor do not know the fantasies of hte rich.  but they do.  and the fantasies os the poor include the fantasies of the rich.  inverted.  upside down, inside out.  the private fantasies of the privileged are like fodder to the oppressed.  okay.  not like fodder.  but how do the private fantasies of the privileged create the situations thatt the poor live in?  forget private life.  or atleast our conceptions of privacy.   we need to redefine the inner and the outer.  the private and the public.  cause what we think of as the private is often quite public.

Permalink Leave a Comment

checkpoints and washington, dc

June 11, 2008 at 7:37 pm (anti-oppression, anti-racism, palestine)

when i would return from the west bank to my birth city of wash, dc, people would ask about the danger level in the west bank.  two things i would always say: my biggest threat is from the israeli soldiers who claim to be keeping the peace between the palestinians and israeli settlers and in many ways it is no more dangerous than here.
how can the police officers tell the difference between kids coming home from choir practice and kids selling violence?  are they psychics?
when you build a cage for a community do you still think of them as human beings like you?  or as a breed?
Lanier plans to seal off rough ’hoods in latest effort to stop wave of violence

WASHINGTON (Map, News) – D.C. police will seal off entire neighborhoods, set up checkpoints and kick out strangers under a new program that D.C. officials hope will help them rescue the city from its out-of-control violence.


Under an executive order expected to be announced today, police Chief Cathy L. Lanier will have the authority to designate “Neighborhood Safety Zones.” At least six officers will man cordons around those zones and demand identification from people coming in and out of them. Anyone who doesn’t live there, work there or have “legitimate reason” to be there will be sent away or face arrest, documents obtained by The Examiner show.

Lanier has been struggling to reverse D.C.’s spiraling crime rate but has been forced by public outcry to scale back several initiatives including her “All Hands on Deck” weekends and plans for warrantless, door-to-door searches for drugs and guns.

Under today’s proposal, the no-go zones will last up to 10 days, according to internal police documents. Front-line officers are already being signed up for training on running the blue curtains.


Peter Nickles, the city’s interim attorney general, said the quarantine would have “a narrow focus.”

“This is a very targeted program that has been used in other cities,” Nickles told The Examiner. “I’m not worried about the constitutionality of it.”

Others are. Kristopher Baumann, chairman of the D.C. police union and a former lawyer, called the checkpoint proposal “breathtaking.”

Shelley Broderick, president of the D.C.-area American Civil Liberties Union and the dean of the University of the District of Columbia’s law school, said the plan was “cockamamie.”

“I think they tried this in Russia and it failed,” she said. “It’s just our experience in this city that we always end up targeting poor people and people of color, and we treat the kids coming home from choir practice the same as we treat those kids who are selling drugs.”

The proposal has the provisional support of D.C. Councilman Harry “Tommy” Thomas, D-Ward 5, whose ward has become a war zone.

“They’re really going to crack down on what we believe to be a systemic problem with open-air drug markets,” Thomas told The Examiner.

Thomas said, though, that he worried about D.C. “moving towards a police state.”

Staff Writer Scott McCabe contributed to this report.

Permalink Leave a Comment

unbought and unbossed

June 9, 2008 at 4:24 pm (anti-oppression, anti-racism, anti-sexism, women of color)

ode to shirley chisholm

Permalink Leave a Comment

June 8, 2008 at 5:40 pm (anti-racism)

August 28, 1955 – Emmitt Till is murderd in Mississippi

August 28, 1963 – Martin Luther King gives his I Have A Dream Speech

Augist 28, 2008 – Barack Obama officially accepts the nomination of the Democratic Party

down from the tower

Permalink Leave a Comment

Next page »